Hello again! Here I am to finish part two, largely due to the persistence of a very lovely human from Deer Park pestering me. :) So thanks to you, dear sister!
I think I have a bit more clarity and spaciousness inside of me to write about this, especially coming off of a very nourishing five days at Deer park Monastery, and now having a beautiful almost three year old pup sleeping peacefully about ten feet away from me. I am delighted for these and other reasons.
Going into my Vipassana retreat I had already been feeling a strong movement inside of me - something telling me to begin to trust my own intuition. To trust it on deeper and deeper levels - beyond what I had been. So by day three, when I began feeling like my desire to leave was a gut knowing, and not just a "this is difficult and sucky and I want to leave" it was difficult to ignore because I was practicing not ignoring. Trusting that I know. But also knowing how hard it was to be there, I didn't want to listen to avoidance masquerading as intuition, so I decided to wait and see. Days 1 through 4 were preparation for the vipassana technique, as I mentioned previously. Day 4 in the evening was the beginning of vipassana instruction. So here is some more of why I left, attempting to build on what was already there:
1) The chanting from Goenka annoyed the living crap out of me. As did his particular way of guiding the meditation. I have since realized how much repetition frustrates me. Especially when it feels SO unnecessary. I know there are contexts when repetition really is the key to learning something, but I don't want someone to run through the list of every possible sensation I might notice on the surface of my body at my scalp... and then run through the entire list (slowly, hypnotically) again for my face. And then again on my arms. And then again on my chest. And then again... and again... and again... and I am talking about a list of like 15 or 20 different sensations. Numbness.... itchiness... scratchy... burning... tingle... pain... tickle... and on... and on.... and on.... See, I understood after the first two times... it was any sensation. I got it. Etc.
And the chanting. I literally had to press the tongue to the roof of my mouth and bite down hard to not burst out laughing when he first started chanting. I don't mean to offend any Goenka lovers, truly, but to me he sounded like a drunken homeless Indian man muttering to himself in the street with a little bit of cadence. It sounded really ridiculous. And it consequently became profoundly distracting and offputting. I realize that annoyance is an energy that one can work with in meditation to great advantage, but when everything is already SO hard and challenging, it just felt like someone was blowing in my face amid all of the other difficulties. It was not helpful. But wait, there's more about this... and it's well beyond just my personal annoyance. In fact, this might be my primary (more) objective critique about the retreat, and here it is:
One of the things you must agree to is to suspend all personal spiritual/religious practices while at the retreat so that you give the vipassana technique a fair trial to see how it works. They ask you to not say the rosary, meditate according to another practice, pray in any way, do yoga, tai chi, etc. They want you to purely experience the technique. However, they explicitly explain that the chanting Goenka does is not part of the technique but something that is a part of the tradition and lineage from India. When he chants in Pali "May all beings be happy" and the students chant three times "Sadhu, sadhu, sadhu" ("Agreed, agreed, agreed") they are very clear that this is NOT part of the Vipassana technique, but something additional and optional. On top of this, the way Goenka guides meditation is basically hypnosis. Now I'm not saying this with some kind of suspicion that he's trying to manipulate retreatants into an altered state, but I have had hypnotherapy on multiple occasions. I can tell you that the cadence of his voice, the timbre, the way he speaks and repeats and directs, it is hypnotherapy. He is implanting hypnotic suggestions such as "work diligently, tirelessly, patiently" and "you are bound to be successful, bound to be successful." The suggestions themselves are helpful because, as I've mentioned, the retreat is really freaking hard!!! Really hard. But the way his voice brings someone into a semi-hypnotic trance seems like it goes against the idea of just giving the technique a chance without anything else added. Because being guided into an altered brain wave state is, in fact, something else added. So is the experience of listening to/responding to Pali chanting (which I can't stress enough how awful it was, to me). It felt hypocritical, to be honest. You must leave your traditional things behind because they will interfere with giving vipassana fair hearing, but we are going to inject our traditional things into your experience because... "it's tradition" (think Fiddler on the Roof). This might actually be the biggest obstacle to my going back and the biggest frustration and critique I have that feels bigger than just the interplay of my own personal issues and the way the retreat is structured, though it is of course still that.
2) Now here's the really interesting thing, that was the final straw in my feeling it okay to leave. I didn't go to the retreat to have a mystical experience. I think I said that in part 1; I don't recall. Regardless, that was going to be pleasant bonus, but what I wanted was a deepening of my meditation practice, and guidance into how to truly enter and engage my mind, body, feelings, perceptions, etc. in a new way that would create deep liberty in my mind and body. In other words, I wanted the technique to do what they say it is intended to do: provide a means to liberation of the mind at its deepest level. Now I cannot say whether it is capable of that or not. Truly. I can say that as I revisit the Satipatthana Sutta, I don't think that what they teach at Goenka retreats is an accurate translation of the meditation described by the Buddha. And the teacher pointed me to that sutta as the primary influencing text for their technique, albeit with a slightly unique interpretation of the word "feelings." (As an aside, as a former cult member and a scholar of religious studies, I am wary of groups that have private and unique interpretations of particular words.) So I cannot say whether the technique can liberate the mind at its deepest levels. What I could do was look around and ask the deepest question: "Is there anyone here who I feel has found the answer to suffering? Is there anyone here who has something I want so much that this feels worth it to stay?" And, even more, "when I look at the things others have told me about their retreats, does it feel worth it to stay?"
And I want to be really careful and clear right now that I have deep love and respect and admiration for many of my friends who have done 10 day vipassana retreats. There's no way for me to anonymously mention all of you by name, but I think you know who you are, and I hope you know how much I respect your spiritual practice, which is of course made up of many more things besides just vipassana as taught by S.N. Goenka. But I'm going to be honest - most of what would keep me at the retreat was fear of missing out on a peak experience, a dropping away of mind and body and dualism, a feeling of non-separation from the world. But to be even more honest, I'm pretty sure I could have the same experience by eating mushrooms. And that seemed far less painful (side note: I have not, in fact, eaten mushrooms, either before, during or since this retreat). I couldn't look at anyone I knew who did vipassana retreats and feel like "I want what these people have!! I see in them something that makes it worth it to stay." And that of course starts with Goenka himself. I really enjoyed his talks (except for one) and I think he has a lot of wisdom, but I couldn't say that he was evidence to me that this technique would fully liberate a person from suffering. He did not seem like a fully liberated human being. Or so tremendously close that I wanted to follow him. The teachers there were, as I said in part 1, very kind. Very very kind. I felt a lot of love from our male teacher, and I truly want to have that same love towards others who come to my tradition and decide it is not for them. I want to have that kind of awareness and non-attachment, and I think that, by and large, I truly do. But the teachers were not carrying around this sense of spiritual attainment that made me feel the retreat was worth it at any cost. And so many of my friends who I do admire have a spirituality that is a mix of so many things that it is difficult to say how vipassana informs it. And other people I know who have done multiple vipassana retreats and they are still, if you pardon, basically assholes. Well, not strictly assholes, but still fairly self-absorbed and not the type of person I wanted to be. And I kept thinking of friends who have come away saying "I felt so clear after my retreat and it lasted (fill in the blank) amount of time..." But it faded away. That's not what I was looking for. And then I thought about my teacher. Thay Thich Nhat Hanh. I saw that this was truly a human being who had what I wanted. And, yes, I also know people who practice in that tradition who are still, at times, assholes. That happens to. That happens anytime there are people. And please, I say that tongue-in-cheek. I do not believe people are assholes in a 2-dimensional and reductionistic sense. But we sometimes (often?) behave that way. I am digressing. When I thought of my teacher and many of the monastics in his tradition, I thought "yes, this is the energy of transformation I want to cultivate in myself." I do not just want to be very present and aware when I sit, but also when I walk and when I eat and when I talk and when I listen. I did not understand why there was no instruction in walking and eating meditation, as it is so clearly a part of the Buddha's teachings on the path and practice.
And beyond all of this...
3) The suffering of my life didn't feel like it necessitated my enduring the treat. I have a spiritual home. I have a practice. I have a community. The most enjoyable part of the retreat was, before we went into silence, sharing with people about Deer Park and inviting them to visit. Maybe I didn't need something else. As my friend asked me "what are you looking for?" Sigh. Yes. What was I looking for? Am I not already on the path toward liberation of the mind? Toward the end of suffering? I kept thinking about the Buddha's journey toward enlightenment, and the time he spent with the 5 forest ascetics nearly fasting himself to death in his journey to find the answer to suffering. And eventually he realized that they did not have the answer he was looking for. He had gained a lot from them, but he had to go find a middle way - he had to find a path that actually resulted in what he was looking for. And they judged him for it. I kept thinking that maybe my leaving the retreat was my taking a bowl of milk (was it rice? was it milk? I have heard both). Except my judgment was much more from my own self-doubts than it was from others. Or perhaps it came from them, too, I don't know. The analogy actually almost got me to stay, believe it or not. Because the Buddha stayed until he had learned everything he possibly could learn from them. And I had to be honest and say that I could still learn from staying at the retreat. I knew I could. I knew there would have been beneficial things for me to learn. But here is where my own impatience set in. I didn't want to do that. Ultimately my attitude was an idealistic desire to stay and learn everything I could learn so I could build off it into the future, but, in the end "f*** it; I'm not the Buddha!" And so I left.
And since I left I've learned a lot, from this and other contexts, about how impatient I can be. How quickly I can give up on something if I don't see results right away. How I have difficulty trusting and continuing on. How much I always feel like I know "better" than others. And how this can prevent me from benefiting from a path, because, again, I think I "know better." I had a very humbling conversation with a mentor about this very thing - about how much I could stand to benefit from staying the course of personal practice even when it is not yielding immediate results. At the same time, one still must be discerning of where to invest that energy, lest one continue on in Scientology indefinitely in the name of patience, perseverance and trust. Ultimately I just didn't see evidence that it was going to be my personal practice after the retreat; I didn't see evidence that this was indeed a technique capable of fully liberating the individual. And I really wanted a Berry Bowl. So I just left. Maybe that was mara. Maybe I was tricked by the part of myself that is scared to transform. Maybe. Or maybe it just wasn't my place, my people, my practice. Maybe I already have what I need here and now.
I have a couple more things to say, but I will say them in a new post....
Translate
Monday, April 4, 2016
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Why I Left My 10 Day Vipassana Retreat, part 1
Why I went to the retreat:
I went to the retreat because I wanted to deepen my sitting meditation practice. More, I wanted to learn a certain type of meditation - vipassana - in a formal, structured way, one that would force me through the disciplined steps of approaching the meditation practice that I would be far less likely to do on my own. And, if I am being honest, as much as I said that this wasn't my intention, I also think I wanted to experience one or two of those intense mystical moments people talk about where the divide between self and other disappears, the boundaries drop away, mind and body disappear. I was looking for some sort of unitive experience, perhaps as a peripheral but highly desirable effect of going to - and completing - the retreat. At a deep level, I was truly searching for a practice that would inform my meditation going into the future, and inform my day to day journey of awakening, transformation and enlightenment.
What the retreat is:
I'm not going to say much about this. You can search for "Goenka Vipassana retreat" and read all about them. They are free, which is nice - supported by the donations of course alumni. They are 10 days, and they are completely silent. This means no talking, no gestures, no nonverbal communication and preferably no eye contact. They also ask you not to read, not to do any writing or journaling, and to abstain from any and all religious/spiritual practices that you may do as a part of your regular routine/lifestyle. The schedule is this, more or less:
4am: wake up
4:30-6:30: meditate in the hall or in your room
6:30-7:15: breakfast
7:15-8: rest
8-9: formal meditation in hall
9-11: meditate in room or in hall, depending on instructions and preference
11-11:45: lunch
11:45-1: rest or questions in hall with teacher (1 on 1 - this was the only situation where talking was allowed, unless you had to talk to the manager about a logistical concern)
1-2:20: meditate in hall or in room
2:30-3:30: formal meditation in hall
3:30-5: meditate in room or in hall, depending
5-5:30: tea break with the option of fruit and/or milk in tea for first time retreatants
5:30-6: rest
6-7: formal meditation in hall
7-8:15: dvd discourse from S.N. Goenka
8:15-9: meditation in hall
9: rest (lights out by 10)
I won't expand on this except to say two things: 1) there were generous breaks in between sessions so that people could stretch and go to the bathroom. 2) no one was watching over you to smack you if you used any of the room meditation times to nap or sleep in. That was not encouraged, but it was an option.
Last thing to sketch the retreat itself - there is no exercise allowed except for stretching and walking in the designated walking paths (about 1/8 mile loop) during rest times. They ask you not to run, do yoga, etc.
One request. Don't pre-judge the retreat and say "that's so stupid" or "what a ridiculous expectation," etc. One thing about actually going and making the struggle-filled decision to leave: my reasons for leaving feel very deep and vulnerable and difficult. Superficial criticism of the retreat structure seems rather off-putting after engaging with it at a very deep and challenging level. I don't know if that makes sense or not. If not, that's okay. It's also fine if you think these rules are stupid and bonkers. After wrestling with them I've had less objective judgments about whether they are good or bad. I do have a lot to say about my own relationship to them, to which I now turn my attention.
Why I left the retreat (I can't promise that this will be short. In fact, it might end up being quite long):
I can't quite say "I left because it was hard," thought it was. It was painfully hard. Literally. Schedule meditation time was 10 hours and 45 minutes. There is an encouragement to spend as much of this as possible in an upright posture, either kneeling with support or cross legged on a cushion. There is only so much postural adjustment one can perform before the same muscles are exhausted to their core. The silence was challenging, but more than this, the boredom was almost suffocating. There was absolutely nothing to do. Nothing. During the rest times I could nap, walk, or lie on my bed and stare. I could also meditate - were I insane. I could also stretch, if I had a bone lick of energy left in me, which I rarely did. And the silence insofar as it meant "not talking" was relatively easy. The "no acknowledging others in any way including eye contact" was what really punched me in the gut. It felt awkward, forced, and incredibly distracting. After three days of meditating I was so powerfully aware of the people around me. To ignore them felt forced. It felt awkward and uncomfortable. It also felt isolating and difficult. I understand in my head, and even in my heart, the notion of why this is done. It is such a painful thing to be left with ourselves sometimes. To be forced to face the discomforts we find in our mental activity. To be left without ALL of our typical escapes. I understood the notion behind it. Which is why I can't say that I left because it was hard.
More than anything, I left because I lost faith that the meditation technique itself was worth it. In fact, the most powerful and transformative meditative experience I had while there was when I went "off script" and did my own thing. You are, as you can imagine, absolutely not supposed to do this, but I was so damn tired of trying to focus on my breathing while my legs were screaming at me because they were falling asleep that I let myself be with that agony and move into it, body and mind. It was powerful. When the meditation period ended I had to come back to my body. I had the most profound feeling of "what just happened?" But I digress.
When we got to the end of day 4 they began to teach vipassana meditation. Insight meditation. Before this we were building our concentration by attending with one-pointed focus to the breath itself as it entered and exited the nostrils. I understood the benefit of this, though three days of 10 hours a day breath focus was one of the most boring things I've ever invested in. Rewarding and beneficial. But oh so boring!
When the Vipassana instruction commenced I thought, "Wait, is this it? we are just doing body scans? JUST BODY SCANS?? ARE YOU KIDDING ME???" I can't even begin to tell you of the let down I felt inside. I had intended to go to the retreat and "empty my cup." Learn meditation as if I knew nothing about it whatsoever. Drink from their instruction as one would when one is a complete beginner. But when they started teaching us how to go from head to toe, part by part and notice sensations in the body briefly without judgment and then move on to the next part of the body... something inside me just sunk. "This is so disappointing," I thought. I don't know if I thought it in those words, but it was in my body, my heart, everything. I don't know what I expected, exactly - but something different. I met with the teacher to say I was thinking of leaving. That I needed him to talk me into staying. He told me what was coming up. His first words were about the next day's instruction: "You are going to learn how to not just scan down the body, but back up." This was not encouraging. Part of my frustration was that this type of body scan for subtle sensation was painfully easy for me. I do massage and energy work. I practice taiqi, qigong and yoga. I am very familiar with noticing subtle sensations in my body. His progressed map of what the rest of the retreat looked like did not encourage me. When I asked about why we were simply jumping from one sensation to the next instead of staying with sensations long enough to observe "the arising and passing away of phenomena" (a common Buddhist idea) he answered me. His answer was fine, but not satisfying. He said it had to do with how we are prone to cling to or reject sensations based on whether they were pleasant or unpleasant. Forcing ourselves to move on helped us avoid that trap. I got it, but it felt like there were other ways around that conundrum.
He told me that they don't broaden their meditative focus to include the thoughts and feelings, just the body. This was disappointing. He said that when you observe the subtle sensations of the body without any judgment, attraction or aversion, you begin to disentangle the suffering and knots of the mind at the deepest level. The idea is that those sensations are linked to the mind through the body (this is how I understood what he was saying) and so when you can observe the body without reactivity you become less reactive to what passes through your mind and emotional body. I wasn't going to disagree with him, per se, but this really did not introduce anything new or profound into my practice. I had been noticing and observing my body and working to defuse the reactivity and judgment for a long time. I would often broaden this to encompass the feelings that arose as I noticed things in my body. Or even the thoughts. Letting them pass without judgment. Noticing them. Relaxing the bodily tendency to tighten, grip, control or reject those feelings or thoughts as they arose. Just letting them come, letting them go. I just keep thinking "maybe I've already been doing this??" Maybe I wasn't going to get anything from this? Maybe I'm further along in my practice than I thought? All disappointing questions to entertain. Funny that they would be disappointing, but they were.
A friend asked me, about a week after leaving the retreat "what are you looking for?" It was a broad brush question, but it encompassed my going to a retreat, obviously seeking something. I listened to the question with this translation: "What is it you are seeking that you think you don't already have?" I think that is a koan that took me deep into silence. I had no answer. Why did I even go to the retreat? What was I seeking? What did I think I didn't have? How amusing that I was disappointed by the realization that possibly I already had what I needed.
But I left on day five. I kept thinking about how I had six more days off from work and I could spend them on the low-feeling probability that I would get something profound from the retreat OR I could do something that I knew would be enjoyable and meaningful, though with less possibility of helping me have some profound and life-altering spiritual breakthrough.
So I drove home, spent the night in Los Angeles, called my godparents in Sedona, Arizona, and made plans to drive to see them the next day (Tuesday). I went to Berry Bowl the next morning, packed up my car, and went to Sedona.....
(more to come: a little about my time in Sedona, and a lot about my reflections on the retreat itself once I had removed myself from it... a bit of subjective objectivity, if you will... including that feeling I finally had of "I am home" when I had my first walking meditation with my Wednesday night sangha in Pasadena.... Oh... and if I forget to put it in my next post, I really need to say that when I decided to leave, the teacher at the retreat was incredibly kind. He was caring, compassionate and loving, without a trace of judgment or shaming. This was so meaningful, and to me is the one thing that truly moved my heart to deep gratitude. I can't forget to say that, so I am saying it now. To be continued...)
I went to the retreat because I wanted to deepen my sitting meditation practice. More, I wanted to learn a certain type of meditation - vipassana - in a formal, structured way, one that would force me through the disciplined steps of approaching the meditation practice that I would be far less likely to do on my own. And, if I am being honest, as much as I said that this wasn't my intention, I also think I wanted to experience one or two of those intense mystical moments people talk about where the divide between self and other disappears, the boundaries drop away, mind and body disappear. I was looking for some sort of unitive experience, perhaps as a peripheral but highly desirable effect of going to - and completing - the retreat. At a deep level, I was truly searching for a practice that would inform my meditation going into the future, and inform my day to day journey of awakening, transformation and enlightenment.
What the retreat is:
I'm not going to say much about this. You can search for "Goenka Vipassana retreat" and read all about them. They are free, which is nice - supported by the donations of course alumni. They are 10 days, and they are completely silent. This means no talking, no gestures, no nonverbal communication and preferably no eye contact. They also ask you not to read, not to do any writing or journaling, and to abstain from any and all religious/spiritual practices that you may do as a part of your regular routine/lifestyle. The schedule is this, more or less:
4am: wake up
4:30-6:30: meditate in the hall or in your room
6:30-7:15: breakfast
7:15-8: rest
8-9: formal meditation in hall
9-11: meditate in room or in hall, depending on instructions and preference
11-11:45: lunch
11:45-1: rest or questions in hall with teacher (1 on 1 - this was the only situation where talking was allowed, unless you had to talk to the manager about a logistical concern)
1-2:20: meditate in hall or in room
2:30-3:30: formal meditation in hall
3:30-5: meditate in room or in hall, depending
5-5:30: tea break with the option of fruit and/or milk in tea for first time retreatants
5:30-6: rest
6-7: formal meditation in hall
7-8:15: dvd discourse from S.N. Goenka
8:15-9: meditation in hall
9: rest (lights out by 10)
I won't expand on this except to say two things: 1) there were generous breaks in between sessions so that people could stretch and go to the bathroom. 2) no one was watching over you to smack you if you used any of the room meditation times to nap or sleep in. That was not encouraged, but it was an option.
Last thing to sketch the retreat itself - there is no exercise allowed except for stretching and walking in the designated walking paths (about 1/8 mile loop) during rest times. They ask you not to run, do yoga, etc.
One request. Don't pre-judge the retreat and say "that's so stupid" or "what a ridiculous expectation," etc. One thing about actually going and making the struggle-filled decision to leave: my reasons for leaving feel very deep and vulnerable and difficult. Superficial criticism of the retreat structure seems rather off-putting after engaging with it at a very deep and challenging level. I don't know if that makes sense or not. If not, that's okay. It's also fine if you think these rules are stupid and bonkers. After wrestling with them I've had less objective judgments about whether they are good or bad. I do have a lot to say about my own relationship to them, to which I now turn my attention.
Why I left the retreat (I can't promise that this will be short. In fact, it might end up being quite long):
I can't quite say "I left because it was hard," thought it was. It was painfully hard. Literally. Schedule meditation time was 10 hours and 45 minutes. There is an encouragement to spend as much of this as possible in an upright posture, either kneeling with support or cross legged on a cushion. There is only so much postural adjustment one can perform before the same muscles are exhausted to their core. The silence was challenging, but more than this, the boredom was almost suffocating. There was absolutely nothing to do. Nothing. During the rest times I could nap, walk, or lie on my bed and stare. I could also meditate - were I insane. I could also stretch, if I had a bone lick of energy left in me, which I rarely did. And the silence insofar as it meant "not talking" was relatively easy. The "no acknowledging others in any way including eye contact" was what really punched me in the gut. It felt awkward, forced, and incredibly distracting. After three days of meditating I was so powerfully aware of the people around me. To ignore them felt forced. It felt awkward and uncomfortable. It also felt isolating and difficult. I understand in my head, and even in my heart, the notion of why this is done. It is such a painful thing to be left with ourselves sometimes. To be forced to face the discomforts we find in our mental activity. To be left without ALL of our typical escapes. I understood the notion behind it. Which is why I can't say that I left because it was hard.
More than anything, I left because I lost faith that the meditation technique itself was worth it. In fact, the most powerful and transformative meditative experience I had while there was when I went "off script" and did my own thing. You are, as you can imagine, absolutely not supposed to do this, but I was so damn tired of trying to focus on my breathing while my legs were screaming at me because they were falling asleep that I let myself be with that agony and move into it, body and mind. It was powerful. When the meditation period ended I had to come back to my body. I had the most profound feeling of "what just happened?" But I digress.
When we got to the end of day 4 they began to teach vipassana meditation. Insight meditation. Before this we were building our concentration by attending with one-pointed focus to the breath itself as it entered and exited the nostrils. I understood the benefit of this, though three days of 10 hours a day breath focus was one of the most boring things I've ever invested in. Rewarding and beneficial. But oh so boring!
When the Vipassana instruction commenced I thought, "Wait, is this it? we are just doing body scans? JUST BODY SCANS?? ARE YOU KIDDING ME???" I can't even begin to tell you of the let down I felt inside. I had intended to go to the retreat and "empty my cup." Learn meditation as if I knew nothing about it whatsoever. Drink from their instruction as one would when one is a complete beginner. But when they started teaching us how to go from head to toe, part by part and notice sensations in the body briefly without judgment and then move on to the next part of the body... something inside me just sunk. "This is so disappointing," I thought. I don't know if I thought it in those words, but it was in my body, my heart, everything. I don't know what I expected, exactly - but something different. I met with the teacher to say I was thinking of leaving. That I needed him to talk me into staying. He told me what was coming up. His first words were about the next day's instruction: "You are going to learn how to not just scan down the body, but back up." This was not encouraging. Part of my frustration was that this type of body scan for subtle sensation was painfully easy for me. I do massage and energy work. I practice taiqi, qigong and yoga. I am very familiar with noticing subtle sensations in my body. His progressed map of what the rest of the retreat looked like did not encourage me. When I asked about why we were simply jumping from one sensation to the next instead of staying with sensations long enough to observe "the arising and passing away of phenomena" (a common Buddhist idea) he answered me. His answer was fine, but not satisfying. He said it had to do with how we are prone to cling to or reject sensations based on whether they were pleasant or unpleasant. Forcing ourselves to move on helped us avoid that trap. I got it, but it felt like there were other ways around that conundrum.
He told me that they don't broaden their meditative focus to include the thoughts and feelings, just the body. This was disappointing. He said that when you observe the subtle sensations of the body without any judgment, attraction or aversion, you begin to disentangle the suffering and knots of the mind at the deepest level. The idea is that those sensations are linked to the mind through the body (this is how I understood what he was saying) and so when you can observe the body without reactivity you become less reactive to what passes through your mind and emotional body. I wasn't going to disagree with him, per se, but this really did not introduce anything new or profound into my practice. I had been noticing and observing my body and working to defuse the reactivity and judgment for a long time. I would often broaden this to encompass the feelings that arose as I noticed things in my body. Or even the thoughts. Letting them pass without judgment. Noticing them. Relaxing the bodily tendency to tighten, grip, control or reject those feelings or thoughts as they arose. Just letting them come, letting them go. I just keep thinking "maybe I've already been doing this??" Maybe I wasn't going to get anything from this? Maybe I'm further along in my practice than I thought? All disappointing questions to entertain. Funny that they would be disappointing, but they were.
A friend asked me, about a week after leaving the retreat "what are you looking for?" It was a broad brush question, but it encompassed my going to a retreat, obviously seeking something. I listened to the question with this translation: "What is it you are seeking that you think you don't already have?" I think that is a koan that took me deep into silence. I had no answer. Why did I even go to the retreat? What was I seeking? What did I think I didn't have? How amusing that I was disappointed by the realization that possibly I already had what I needed.
But I left on day five. I kept thinking about how I had six more days off from work and I could spend them on the low-feeling probability that I would get something profound from the retreat OR I could do something that I knew would be enjoyable and meaningful, though with less possibility of helping me have some profound and life-altering spiritual breakthrough.
So I drove home, spent the night in Los Angeles, called my godparents in Sedona, Arizona, and made plans to drive to see them the next day (Tuesday). I went to Berry Bowl the next morning, packed up my car, and went to Sedona.....
(more to come: a little about my time in Sedona, and a lot about my reflections on the retreat itself once I had removed myself from it... a bit of subjective objectivity, if you will... including that feeling I finally had of "I am home" when I had my first walking meditation with my Wednesday night sangha in Pasadena.... Oh... and if I forget to put it in my next post, I really need to say that when I decided to leave, the teacher at the retreat was incredibly kind. He was caring, compassionate and loving, without a trace of judgment or shaming. This was so meaningful, and to me is the one thing that truly moved my heart to deep gratitude. I can't forget to say that, so I am saying it now. To be continued...)
Friday, February 5, 2016
Letting it be enough
I have noticed a pattern lately in which some of my MOST unhealthy behaviors seem traceable to a simple inability (I think I ought to say "difficulty" rather than "inability") to let things be enough, as they are. What I mean is this - I go for a short walk and I enjoy it. I think I should walk farther, because if I enjoyed this short walk, I should extend it and walk even more. I watch something funny or inspiring online and I want something that increases that feeling even more. Something even MORE inspiring and/or funny.
As little of a thing as this can seem at first, I have noticed that it leads me down paths in my thoughts and actions that are quite disastrous. As I sat observing my simple, ordinary experience today, the thought came to me, "why isn't this enough?" Why can't I let this be enough? And then I could. At least then, in that moment. The strange thing is to notice that I'm looking for some kind of capping experience that alters ordinary life into something always marked by some kind of completion. Instead of allowing the experience of a moment to be what it is, I start seeking ways to make it "better" or "more." I am, if you'll pardon expression, seeking some kind of emotional orgasm. Something to bring me to a satiated, almost drug-like state. Something to push me beyond the realm of "ordinary" and into something I think is more complete and sublime.
It makes me think of the times at Deer Park when I have had that textbook eating meditation experience: I sit down, the bell is invited, and we start to eat. As I take a few bites I realize I really want some soy sauce on my lentils or rice. But the practice is to stay seated and be with the meal in front of me. I can't get up and "fix" it. So I have an opportunity to let the meal in front of me be enough. To not need to improve it, build upon it, make it better, etc. To simply dive more deeply into the experience of what it is, rather than seeking to make it into some penultimate ideal of what I think it should or could be. When I do that, I realize that it really is enough - as soon as I let go of the story in my head saying that it "should" be something better, more fulfilling, more intoxicating.
I suppose I could even play that game with this blog post. Perhaps, in light of this realization, and because it is late, I will simply let this be enough.
As little of a thing as this can seem at first, I have noticed that it leads me down paths in my thoughts and actions that are quite disastrous. As I sat observing my simple, ordinary experience today, the thought came to me, "why isn't this enough?" Why can't I let this be enough? And then I could. At least then, in that moment. The strange thing is to notice that I'm looking for some kind of capping experience that alters ordinary life into something always marked by some kind of completion. Instead of allowing the experience of a moment to be what it is, I start seeking ways to make it "better" or "more." I am, if you'll pardon expression, seeking some kind of emotional orgasm. Something to bring me to a satiated, almost drug-like state. Something to push me beyond the realm of "ordinary" and into something I think is more complete and sublime.
It makes me think of the times at Deer Park when I have had that textbook eating meditation experience: I sit down, the bell is invited, and we start to eat. As I take a few bites I realize I really want some soy sauce on my lentils or rice. But the practice is to stay seated and be with the meal in front of me. I can't get up and "fix" it. So I have an opportunity to let the meal in front of me be enough. To not need to improve it, build upon it, make it better, etc. To simply dive more deeply into the experience of what it is, rather than seeking to make it into some penultimate ideal of what I think it should or could be. When I do that, I realize that it really is enough - as soon as I let go of the story in my head saying that it "should" be something better, more fulfilling, more intoxicating.
I suppose I could even play that game with this blog post. Perhaps, in light of this realization, and because it is late, I will simply let this be enough.
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
Spiritual Ego
Lately I have been pondering my plans for how often I will go to Deer Park this year. Last year at this time I was going down 1 or 2 times per month, which lasted the first seven months of the year until the monastery closed so that the monks and nuns could travel and lead retreats around the country.
This year I am anticipating being there with less frequency, which gnaws at me a little bit. As I've reflected on it, however, I have realized that part of the reason it bothers me - perhaps a way too big part, is that I've gotten used to feeling this strange ego boost from my relationship to the community at Deer Park. I go there often enough and feel at home enough there that people ask me if I live there. I have friend who are monks and who are nuns. Some of them I correspond with, collaborate with, organize with, etc. And I have begun to realize how much a part of my spiritual ego identity it is when I am here in Los Angeles or Pasadena to talk about my nun friend this or my monk friend this or my other friend who used to be a monk, etc. I feel special and unique. I have this set of experiences that others do not - I am unique and interesting and fascinating and special... and somewhere in my reflections upon this I have decided that I want to stop holding up flashing neon signs that say "I am friends with nuns and monks at a Buddhist monastery...." and so forth. I want to just practice. And I can do that at home OR at the monastery. I can do that with friends who have never been to Deer Park. I can wear my connection to a place with much less ego and pomp. I can just be a person in the world. Like Rilke's beautiful verse:
I’m too alone in the world, yet not alone enough
to make each hour holy
I’m too small in the world, yet not small enough
to be simply in your presence, like a thing—
just as it is.
I think it is easy to to want to be more than what we are, just as we are, in any given moment. Because my practice is about a practice, not a place. And it is about a spiritual community, but not as a sense of ego identity, but a place and a way of being together to call home. And that is something that can be nurtured everywhere and anywhere. It doesn't need to be in the mountains of Escondido or at Plum Village in the south of France. I can just be who I am in any moment. To simply be in the presence of something holy. Myself. My steps. The earth. All of you.
Every day.
This year I am anticipating being there with less frequency, which gnaws at me a little bit. As I've reflected on it, however, I have realized that part of the reason it bothers me - perhaps a way too big part, is that I've gotten used to feeling this strange ego boost from my relationship to the community at Deer Park. I go there often enough and feel at home enough there that people ask me if I live there. I have friend who are monks and who are nuns. Some of them I correspond with, collaborate with, organize with, etc. And I have begun to realize how much a part of my spiritual ego identity it is when I am here in Los Angeles or Pasadena to talk about my nun friend this or my monk friend this or my other friend who used to be a monk, etc. I feel special and unique. I have this set of experiences that others do not - I am unique and interesting and fascinating and special... and somewhere in my reflections upon this I have decided that I want to stop holding up flashing neon signs that say "I am friends with nuns and monks at a Buddhist monastery...." and so forth. I want to just practice. And I can do that at home OR at the monastery. I can do that with friends who have never been to Deer Park. I can wear my connection to a place with much less ego and pomp. I can just be a person in the world. Like Rilke's beautiful verse:
I’m too alone in the world, yet not alone enough
to make each hour holy
I’m too small in the world, yet not small enough
to be simply in your presence, like a thing—
just as it is.
I think it is easy to to want to be more than what we are, just as we are, in any given moment. Because my practice is about a practice, not a place. And it is about a spiritual community, but not as a sense of ego identity, but a place and a way of being together to call home. And that is something that can be nurtured everywhere and anywhere. It doesn't need to be in the mountains of Escondido or at Plum Village in the south of France. I can just be who I am in any moment. To simply be in the presence of something holy. Myself. My steps. The earth. All of you.
Every day.
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Mindful Crashing
Part 1 – The Incident
About a month ago, someone I know posted on Facebook about
an accident she had falling off the back of a motorcycle. She mentioned that through previous moments
of bodily trauma in her life, she had always rushed on too quickly, neglecting
to pay proper attention the actual experience her body was having. She said that this time, after she fell, she
sat on the ground and became aware of her body, her surroundings, her
sensations. Mindful of her presence in
the road, she moved to the side of the road and sat down, giving more attention
to the injuries and shock her body and mind had just sustained. Sitting with those and honoring them. This past Saturday, when I swerved to avoid a
car who was crossing over the double yellow lines separating the carpool lane
from the rest of the highway, when I squeezed my brake as hard as I could to
avoid slamming into the car in the next lane over and hit it anyway, when I sat
on the asphalt of the 405 aware that I had just had my first motorcycle
accident and I was both conscious and alive, this was the first thing that came
into my mind – this woman’s post on Facebook.
And I thought, don’t move yet. Just
sit for a moment. How are you in your
body? Sit with that. Be present.
And so I was. And I realized I
was okay. I was alive and sitting on the
road by my bike. I could see, breathe,
stand up... I was alive. Then I realized
I was sitting on the 405, and there was probably a host of people around in
their cars wondering if I was “okay” (I’ve come to realize in the past 4 days
that there is no objective gauge for what this word “okay” means). I waved to the car in front of me to signal I
was not dead or dying. I stood up. The car that had necessitated my swerve was
gone already. The car I hit had not
moved. I walked up to the woman driving
and said “I’m okay, but there’s damage to your back bumper. Do you want to pull off to the shoulder and
exchange information?”
“What?”
I repeated.
“Okay.”
I lifted my bike, got back on it, started it (!) and began
to slowly creep across five lanes of traffic to the shoulder, with this other
driver following me, her mom in the passenger’s seat. I was aware that my wrist was not happy to be
operating the throttle and brake, but it was not very far. I got to the shoulder and kickstanded/turned
off my bike. The young lady got out of
her car with her mom and they both came back to me “are you okay?” Yes, I assured them. I was okay.
I looked down and saw that my jeans had been torn from about the knee to
about the hip. There was an abrasion on
my left thigh. Nothing major – the type
of thing you get from taking a spill playing basketball or falling off your
bicycle. And my wrist was hurting. We called an officer to fill out a
report. The woman and her mother invited
me to sit in the back of their car rather than standing on the side of the
highway. I accepted the invitation,
gratefully. The logistics of information
exchange, speaking with the very kind, helpful, and supportive police officer
all happened amid the loud noises of freeway traffic. The lady I hit and her mom were incredibly
kind. They eventually left and I waited
with the CHP officer for the tow truck to arrive. After the truck arrived for my bike (which
was in surprisingly good shape!), I said goodbye to the officer (who, sadly,
wasn’t willing to take a picture of me in the back seat of his police car so I
could send it to my mom). I got in the
tow truck and we began the 45 minute drive to northeast LA. When I got home, I had to check in with my
body again. How was I feeling? What was I experiencing? What do I do about the fact that I have four
massage clients scheduled in the next two days, and I just had my first
motorcycle accident? I am so grateful to
the seeds planted in my consciousness by my dear sister on Facebook. The encouragement to stop and be
present. To hold my body in love and
tenderness and awareness. To truly be
there and to listen. I don’t know what
fruit my practice would have yielded without the explicit reminder that had
stuck in my brain when I read it, but having it so fresh in my consciousness
was a gift and a miracle. It is not
common to hit the pavement of the 405 and have my first thought be, “how are
you, body?” But it set the tone for a
very sacred experience of being with my experience from that moment to this one.
Part 2 – The Healing
After
Fast forward.
Saturday night I cannot sleep until 2am.
General discomfort, and I think maybe I am still in shock. Sunday is something of a blur. Lots of emotions from lots of different
things. You know, because life doesn’t
necessarily stop simply because we are hurt.
I don’t go anywhere, except to walk down to my yoga studio and say hello
to some friends. I am splendidly
tired. Partly because of how long it
took me to fall asleep, partly because my body is repairing itself on so many
levels I can’t even begin to imagine. I
have decided by mid afternoon that I will not go in to work on Monday. Sunday night I sleep better. I think I take aspirin more proactively so
the pain doesn’t keep me up. Monday
morning I wake up and I realize my body is still charged with fear and
anxiety. The sheer physiological trauma
of impact, alongside all of the stress hormone reactions that are created in
the body by such events, still sits in almost every cell of my body. I realize that my greatest task for Monday is
to figure out how to heal and release this trauma. I realize I am afraid. That I want to curl up in a ball and
cry. And on Monday morning I do let
myself huddle up on my bed for awhile and “dry cry.” It’s been a long time since I’ve been very
“good” at crying (meaning it’s hard for me to know how to let tears just come),
so sometimes I just let my body go through the motions to move some of the
energy. I realize it is time for
meditation. I sit on my cushion. I don’t sit to feel peaceful, I sit to give
honor and give space to the fear and trauma.
I sit to let the cells feel. And
they do. For the first half hour or so,
the moment of impact plays in my brain again and again. Each time I think of the crash my body
twitches, jerks, or convulses. It is
releasing something. I let it. I’ve heard that animals who are wounded will
go off by themselves and tremble. They
are quite literally shaking off the trauma (thank you, Taylor Swift, for the
good advice). I let myself twitch. I let myself tremble. I let myself connect with what I want. I want someone to hold me, but I’m too
vulnerable at the same time. I want
female energy, but I don’t want complications or emotional entanglement. After awhile I realize that I am still that
child wanting his mother. I don’t judge
this. I just let it be. I let that yearning grow. After 45 minutes, the bell on my phone
sounds. It feels like the process has
only begun. I reset the timer and end up
sitting for another 35 minutes.
After a while, I realize that what I’m wanting isn’t
actually for my physical mother to be holding me. I wouldn’t reject her presence, but it’s only
an image or a metaphor for what I’m seeking.
It’s not the literal thing. I
think of going to Deer Park on Sunday and the people I will see there. I think of my dear monastic sister who
becomes more and more like a blood sister every time I see her. I think of how I hug trees when I am at the monastery. I realize I need to go hug a tree. I plan to go for walking meditation when I am
done sitting. I think of the trees
outside that I can hug. Somewhere before
or after this I realized that I can take a bath. I realize that I can honor sensual but not
sexual craving I have for touch, for reassurance, for being held by letting
myself be safely enveloped by water. I
plan for a bath. I realize I am healing
through the elements. Air: the breath in
my sitting meditation . Earth: walking
meditation. Hugging the trees –
wood. Sitting in the bath – water. I decide without having to decide that the
accident itself had enough fire energy for many days.
I realize that this might be the first time I have had any
connection with the idea of “mother” earth.
I’ve always wanted to, but I always knew in my heart that the phrase was
simply something I said to sound “right.”
I’ve never really had much felt experience of the earth as my
mother. As a living system, yes. As a source and sustainer of life for us all,
yes. As our sacred home,
absolutely. As our mother? No. No
that is not how I’ve known this precious planet. And then I realize that my longing for my
mother to hold me is actually a longing that could be met in the experience of
the earth. I think of hugging the
trees. Of opening up my heart and
letting the pain and fear and grief from the past two days pour out into that
tree – into the earth, and I realize that it can hold it. Can hold me.
I think about writing this blog post – and about how much
more my Caltech friends will consider me a “dirty hippie.” Actually hugging trees. I smile internally. Doesn’t matter. I need to heal. Something about sliding into a car on the
freeway generated a trauma energy in me that needs to release. I’m not ashamed or embarrassed by my need to
hug trees – to have my sacred mother earth embrace me. At Deer Park we talk of “earth holding.” I was asking the earth to hold me.
I realized that my fear was as much about what didn’t happen as it was about what did happen. Meaning, I wasn’t just scared of the
collision. I was scared of what the
collision could have been – death. I
went back to the moment of impact in my mind.
I pictured it differently. I
pictured the force more violent, something different happening, a different
angle or velocity or trajectory. I
pictured dying. In one way, at least,
quite graphically. I relaxed my body in
meditation and didn’t react physically to the image. I didn’t let mental notions or judgments
about this being horrible or awful or unthinkable creep into the visualization. I just let it be. I could have died. I relaxed and breathed. That was okay. Then what?
I thought of the trauma it would have been for the cars around me to
watch me die on the highway. I breathed
into that trauma, too. I realized that
even this would heal, eventually. Even
if it took generations. Even if it lived
in them in some way and in their children and in their children’s children. Eventually the pain would heal. The seeds of transformation are ever
present. Even the greatest traumas
(which this would not have been) can be transformed – can be healed – can wash
away. No matter how much blood is shed,
the river will eventually wash it away, eventually. This doesn’t make pain easy to bear, but it
does remind me that everything passes.
That fear is not worth the energy.
It let the cells open and release that trauma. Not just the trauma of what happened, but the
trauma of what could have happened. It
doesn’t mean I plan to go out and get killed.
It does mean that the fear-energy doesn’t live and move in my cells
anymore.
I went outside and walked slowly along the sidewalk. Present with my steps. Walking on the earth. The miracle, Thay says. Truly that day it was a miracle. I could be dead. Any time you crash a motorcycle you could be
dead. I wasn’t being melodramatic. It wasn’t a “hey look at me, can you believe
what I just survived!” type of awareness.
I’m not a Lifetime movie. I’m
just aware that it is/was a possibility.
But instead of being buried or cremated, I am walking on the earth. Two days after a motorcycle accident on the
405, I am walking on the sidewalk, breathing the air, being with my steps,
honoring my body’s wisdom. Honoring my
need to surrender and heal. Miracle. I am alive.
I stop and hug a tree.
When I hug people I don’t open my heart and flood them with the pain I
carry inside of me. I embrace them as a
welcoming, a meeting of souls and bodies and friends. When I hugged the tree I was hugging the
earth. I was hugging my mother. I let myself melt. I let myself become a small child. A hurting child. I let myself sink into the bark and empty the
damaged, fearful, skittish and frightened parts of myself into the energy of
this representative of the planet’s love.
The planet’s ability to love, embrace, accept, transform and heal. I wonder if my pain nourishes the tree-life
the way my respiratory waste (CO2) nourishes it. I wonder if we are built in symbiosis in this
way as well. I wonder if the trees offer
us their trauma as healing for us and if our traumas can be life for the world
of plants when offered in love, gratitude and sincerity. I don’t think about that for very long. I am
too busy being held by my mother. I am
too busy pouring out.
I let go. I feel
cleansed. In my bones. In my heart.
In my core. I keep walking. Slowly.
Mindfully. I hope no one calls
the cops on me because I look like a fucking weirdo. I cross the street and walk back. Dogs like to bark. I feel sad that they are not more at
peace. I think about how fear cycles
into the animal kingdom. How we live in
a world where there is violence, and so we train dogs to protect us. This is not “wrong.” It just shows how our fear conditions the
worlds we create around us. I look at
the dogs with loving, sad eyes as they snarl at me through the fence. I walk a little farther away because I don’t
want to incite them to this kind of protecting.
Most of the dogs who are barking simply seem to enjoy the sound of their
own bark. Only one dog truly seems
hostile and angry. I keep walking. I hug another tree. I stop and touch the bark of still
another. There’s an energy there. I could spend all day with it. I am more healed now than I ever could have
expected to be two hours previously.
Part 3 – Healing with
my motorcycle
Eventually I come back to my home and I look at my bike
across the street. I realize it is time to
go make peace with my bike. I don’t
pressure myself. I walk over and sit
down on the curb next to my bike. Like a
friend you haven’t seen since a big fight.
Just sit, don’t say anything.
Just let the energy become safe.
I looked at it. Impressed at how
it held up under the collision.
Impressed at how my own body held up.
Saturday night in the shower I had thanked my right arm for
taking the brunt of the impact. I
thought about how my jeans tore. I
thought about how my leg got scraped up, and I realized how much more severe my
wounds could have been. The pain in my
wrist was from its absorbing momentum that would have otherwise been
transferred and absorbed elsewhere in my body.
The price my arm paid in taking that momentum saved other parts of me in
ways I can’t know. I thanked my arm from
the bottom of my heart. Perhaps it even
saved my life. Probably it saved my leg from a deeper cut or a stronger
bruising.
I look at the bike from the curb. Not an enemy.
Not unsafe. Not a danger. I sit on the bike, hold its handlebars in my
hands. I think I would have started
shaking if I had done this two hours earlier.
But I’ve already played out the “worst” case scenario of motorcycle death
in my mind. I’ve realized I don’t need
to be scared. Sitting on the motorcycle,
I am at peace. I am truly at peace. My neighbor comes home and asks how I
am. I say I am okay and that I am doing
some of my psychological healing. She
nods as if to say that is a good and natural and appropriate thing to do. She says she is going to the store in twenty
minutes and asks if I need anything. I
say, “Which store?” She says Vons. I say “Epsom salts.” She says she will get some if they have
any. I know they have some. A few hours later her five year old brings me
epsom salts. I thank her and she walks
away. I’ve never been handed epsolm
salts by a five year old before. The
universe is always creating new situations.
How many times have I said “there’s a sentence I never thought I would
hear in my life!” Every experience is –
or at least can be – something brand new.
“There are no ordinary moments.”
Or maybe every moment is ordinary, and the ordinary is also
extraordinary.
I don’t think I realize how much I needed this day of
mindfulness until I watch myself on Tuesday doing things that would have
completely paralyzed me at another phase of my life. My bike is towed to the dealership. I go to the rental car agency. I go to urgent care. I get an x-ray. I go from urgent care to CVS to fill a
prescription. I sit and talk with
someone for a long time. I go home and
have a message from the insurance adjustor.
My motorcycle is totaled.
Totaled? It looked like I
wouldn’t even round out my deductible payment and it’s totaled. I call the dealership to confirm. Totaled.
I need a new vehicle. I call my
dad and we brainstorm. When I can’t
handle anymore I say “I’m maxed out, let’s talk more later.” No hostility, no irritation, just
acknowledgement. It’s been a long four
days. I go to Caltech and put in an
appearance at the group meeting of one of the research groups with which I
work. I’m not sure if they all know what
happened, but I think they do. I get a
few smiles. I’m glad to let them see
that I’m still alive. I leave to go see
my boss and another coworker who are both not there. I leave to go see another person on
campus. Also not there. I go to acupuncture. Another way of caring for and loving myself through
this process.
Part 4 – Right
Mindfulness and Ongoing Reflections
I think about the lesson I learned and lived throughout
these few days - to take the time to ask/listen for what needs to be done… and then
do that thing (and sometimes that thing is to do nothing). My conversations with my insurance company
(about an hour’s worth of conversations in between finding out my bike was
totaled and calling my father) was no less a practice in mindfulness than my
hour and twenty minutes of sitting meditation the day before. If I had chosen to sit on my meditation cushion
when I needed to call Geico, I would have been hiding from the thing that was
indicated for my life in that moment. If
I had tried to have an hour conversation with my insurance company instead of
sitting and letting my body relive its trauma in a healing way, I would have
been doing what far too much of the world today does: charging ahead of my
healing. Acting unskillfully,
unmindfully, and unaware of the habit energies determining my behaviors and
running my life when I am neither conscious nor awake. In each moment I have had the opportunity to
live mindfully and awake. This is not
about perfection; it is about intention.
I am sure there were many things about the past 4 days that could have
been handled differently, “better.” But
the choice I made from the moment I hit the pavement, inspired and nourished by
someone else’s experiences and reflections, to be present to my body with
mindfulness – that choice began to create a ripple effect in how I have experienced
these subsequent days. The simple act of
stopping to honor my body led to the next moment and the next moment. How do I honor my body now? And now?
And now? How do I honor this
moment – this process – this experience?
“Most people go their whole lives without every really
waking up.” I quoted this in my last
post. It’s so easy to go through life
asleep. Asleep at the wheel, asleep at
work, asleep with friends, asleep while watching tv, asleep while on jury
duty. All I really did was begin to pay
attention and become willing to listen. Continually
listen. I gave my body what it needed
without being self-centered or narcissistic.
I remembered to tell my supervisors I wasn’t coming in. I took care of medical, financial, physical,
emotional, and spiritual needs – none to the neglect of the others. I stopped.
I listened. I sat. I hugged trees. I filed claims. I made phone calls. I didn’t tell a bunch of people what happened
to get sympathy or pity or attention. I
was mindful that, depending on how I told people, it might spark feelings of
fear in them, and so I tried to be careful how I told others, and when. More than anything, perhaps, I did not waste
too much energy fighting this as something that should not have happened, nor
berating myself for being stupid or foolish.
I know that I was driving between lanes. Overall, what I did was safe and yet also
risky. Someone chose to break the law
and cross in front of me over a double yellow line. I have dealt with the frustration, anger, and
disappointment that someone could steer a motorcycle into another car and then
simply drive off. I am still dealing
with that, I guess. I am willing to
reevaluation my priorities that lead me to “lane split.” I am wondering at what point the increase in risk
to my life ever becomes worth consistently being able to “arrive” more speedily
at a destination. Is even a .001% (and
of course it is more than that) increase in the likelihood that I could die on
the road a worthwhile chance to take so that I can cut 15-30 minutes of my
commutes during rush hour? I am
rethinking the words in the fifth mindfulness training: “I am determined not to
gamble.” I do not have a problem with lottery
scratchers or slot machines, but perhaps I think the payoff of getting somewhere
just a little sooner is worth a gamble with my life. I am not answering these questions yet, but I
am sitting with them, and letting them reflect back to me more deeply where the
priorities of this world and myself lie.
It gives me pause to reflect on what is important to me, and why – and
how not lane splitting might be my
most powerful act of nonviolent resistance in a society consumed with getting
“there” more and more quickly. I don’t
know. I do know that I am alive. That I am here on this earth, and that I can
walk on the ground and kiss it with my feet.
I know that I can hug the earth and let it absorb my pain and my trauma
with its seemingly infinite capacity for love and restoration. I know I can celebrate the sunshine and the
starry night sky for another day. And I
know that I am here with you, reading this blog. Either rolling your eyes at my hippie-ness,
or struck by something that for you is a “takeaway” piece of wisdom or
insight. I know that we are here
together. Today. And this, more than anything else, is the miracle.
Thursday, May 7, 2015
Reflections on Continuation, Concrescence and my Uncle Mark
Yesterday was my birthday.
Every time I think of the miracle of coming into this world, I am reminded
of words of Kierkegaard from This
Sickness Unto Death – that we all have two separate consciousnesses with
regard to our being: that of being
and that of having come to be. It is this latter aspect that continually
marvels me. We all have some sense of
existing, in some manner, and at some point in our lives this stark fact
intrudes upon our consciousness. We are.
And that is miracle enough. But
there is another aspect to it: that we have arrived here... as if planted...
through no action of our own whatsoever.
I did not conceive myself, nor did I ensure my survival through the
first many years of childhood. My existence
is the result of innumerable factors, all of which were completely beyond “my”
control or awareness. I have, as it
were, simply “come to be.” And here I
am. For awhile I thought how cruel it
might actually be to bring children into the world. Because these beautiful innocent creatures
inevitably mature to bear the pain and difficulties of adulthood. Because it is difficult to be. Even more, perhaps, it is difficult to
become. I think of the words of Andrea
Gibson: “I asked the Sun, ‘Tell me about the Big Bang.’ It said, ‘It hurts to
become.’” And it does. It hurts to become. But somewhere through the journey of becoming,
I have found a self that is composed, as my teacher continually reminds me, of
“non-self” elements. This year I asked
my father for only one thing for my birthday: a picture of my uncle, Mark, who
died in Vietnam over a decade before I entered the world. Why?
Because my spiritual practice has awakened me to the fact that I am a
continuation of those who have come before me.
My Uncle Mark influenced my father to the very depths of his being – influenced
the kind of man he sought to be in the world, and the kind of integrity he
sought and continually seeks to embody.
And his death began in my father a journey of questioning the sense – or
lack thereof – that exists or does not exist in the world… a world where people
die for no real reason (at least in the sense we are normally conditioned to
seek for reasons), where painful things happen, where difficulty is
inherent. Where it hurts to become. And my father became. And continues to become. And my mother, who brought me into this world
through the vehicle of her body, she also continues to become. And it is in their becoming that I found
doorways to my own. My journey out of
the trenches of myopic manifestations of my childhood faith began when my mother
opened that door for herself. Her choice
of freedom over fear – her light – gave me permission to choose freedom as
well, gave me permission to open to that same light in me. Shining in the darkness.
And sometimes it is enough to know that we are a
continuation of those who have come before us.
Sometimes it is not. Because the
people who proceed us do not always continue to become. Sometimes they become
stuck, and we feel as though we are pushing forward through sludge and
resistance, seeking to break ties that bind us to people and heritages that we
no longer wish to embody. To things that
we did not ask for, because we did not ask to be born. We did not ask for this “having come to
be.” And yet we are here. And that, I think, is when it helps to
remember that those who continue after us are continuations of us. My uncle did not know when he died in Vietnam
over 45 years ago that his life would continue in me, or in my brother who
inherited his name. But it has. He has. And just as surely others will be the
continuation of my life and being in the world.
The little boy who was my child for those sacred months in 2013 is a
continuation of me, whether he knows it or not. Whether he ever knows it. The friends who share this path with me. The people whose lives I touch simply by
being. By becoming. And yes, sometimes it hurts to become.
In my Buddhist tradition we speak of the birthday as a
“continuation day,” and I believe I have just touched a bit upon why. We do not have a single moment when we become
a person and then, from that moment on, we just are, solidly, unchangingly.
We are always becoming, and our life begins before we are
conceived. We live as seeds in our
mothers and fathers, even in the most specific and biological ways. Cellularly and physiologically you can trace
that back even further, of course, to the ways in which an egg cell forms in
the ovaries, or the strange mechanisms by which sperm is produced in the male
body (I know, no one wants to think of these things with regard to parents, but
these are the miracles that create and continue us as living beings). The water, the nutrients, the sunlight, the
oxygen, the miraculous becoming of a human being from non-human elements. And then there is the passing on of
psychology and sociology – culture and conditioning, education, awareness,
language. We are beings who
inherit. Beings who come to be. Beings who become. And at some point in our lives we realize
that we are. That we possess some
faculty of self-determination and awareness.
We come to understand that the choices that we make create conditions
that give rise to the ways in which we will continue in the world. Not only in ourselves, but also in the
“selves” of others around us, the Earth, the living and non-living systems that
comprise it, and on and on and on. Thay
(Thich Nhat Hanh) once said that we have as much free will as we have
mindfulness. In my own life I have found
that mindfulness creates a space between my experience of life circumstances
and my responses to those circumstances.
As I cultivate mindfulness through meditation, insight, love, stillness
and breath, I come to see that my choices are not simply mindless continuations
of the factors that have brought me here.
I come to see that I am a synthesizing, integrating entity in the
world. A locus of what the philosopher
Whitehead called “Creative Concrescence.”
I am a being in which the universe takes its history and makes radical
novelty in any given moment – the universe gives birth to new manifestations of
itself, through me, in every moment. But
I only truly get to be this instrument of concrescence when I am awake. I am reminded of the line in the movie
Peaceful Warrior:
“What would you say if I told you I keep seeing those shoes
in a dream?”
“I’d say maybe you’re still sleeping. People can go their whole lives without ever
really waking up.”
And I think that is what life is really about. Waking up.
I think that is what the protests in Baltimore have been about. Hurting people asking a world to wake
up. Asking for insight, love and
attention, the way our bodies ask for the same when they begin to break down
because we have treated them wrongly. And,
as I continue into my 34th year, that is what I want to say. That we do not have to be mere continuations of our
predecessors. We do not simply need to
perpetuate the status quo that we have inherited from generations before
us. We, together, can be those
instruments of concrescence in the world – the beings in whom the universe
conspires to become, to integrate its history into moments of radical freedom
that birth something new. And then I
think that this, too, is continuation.
The caterpillar becomes a butterfly, but only when it acknowledges that
the means that have led it to where it is now have reached their rightful
end. That the time to cocoon has come. The time to decompose, to end. Because in our endings are also our
beginnings. Maybe this is what the
tradition speaks of when we say “no birth; no death.”
I suppose that when I leave this life, I simply want to be
able to say that: I became. And I never
stopped becoming, so that you too, could become. So that we could become. Continuations of one another. Continuations of life. Radical beings of freedom and concrescence in
the world. Seeking integration, life and
beauty.
And I want to honor all of the ancestors, living and dead,
who came before me so that I might “come to be.” I want to honor the work that they did to
become, the pain that they endured, the choices they made to bring me my
freedom, my mindfulness, my “self” made of non-self elements, my becoming. I want to thank my mother, my father, my
brother with whom I grew up and my brother who came into my life much later (11
years ago!). My cousins and friends and
teachers and colleagues. I want to thank the guy in high school I hated like he was the devil incarnate in high school,
because he, too, became a mirror, reflecting me back to myself in the places
where I was guarded, hurting and angry.
I want to thank all of those who have helped me reach this place and
become the person I am, this person who is already fading into the person I will become. The friends and spouse
and romantic partners who have journeyed with me on this path – who have been
so integral to my continuation. To the
continuation of my parents. To the
continuation of my Uncle Mark. To the
movement of this impermanent, empty self, rich with meaning and wonder and awe
and breathtaking beauty and gratitude, through the world. I want to thank my parents (again). Truly.
And my Uncle Mark. Because I am
only just beginning to wake up, this strange person who has, somehow, “come to
be.”
May my continuation be their continuation, and may my
choices make the continuation of others easier, not more difficult. May they contribute to our collective
awakening, to the healing and preservation of the Earth, whose life we are
draining through consumption and overuse.
And lastly, I offer this: if you were not able to give me a birthday
present this year, either because of time or money or because we are not good
friends or because we are good friends and you know that I really want and need
nothing right now, here is what you can give me: Wake Up.
Just a little bit. Breathe. Take a moment to look at the trees outside,
or the sky, or the ground. Touch
something. I mean REALLY touch it, like
there is nothing else in the world except that one thing that you are
touching. Think about where it came
from, how it came to be. See if you can
see the entire cosmos supporting its existence.
Was it created in just or unjust ways?
Ways that can be sustained into the future or ways that drive our planet
toward ill-health and pollution, where we are lost in production, consumption
and despair? What is this thing that you
are touching? Can you see that it is
also you? Can you breathe with that, and
then maybe, just maybe, become a little bit more awake? A little bit more aware. Can you touch life deeply, and be a moment or
an agent of concrescence – of creating newness – of becoming more alive in this
moment? Of helping us ALL wake up,
together.
So here is my wish for THIS birthday: that it would be a bell of mindfulness
for every person I touch, with the energy of the bell gatha that we recite at practice
centers around the world:
Mind, body and speech
joined in perfect oneness,
I send my heart along with the sound of this bell.
May its hearers awaken from forgetfulness
and transcend all anxiety and sorrow.
I send my heart along with the sound of this bell.
May its hearers awaken from forgetfulness
and transcend all anxiety and sorrow.
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Conversations with my father on Facebook
A few days ago I posted a political article on Facebook
about the next presidential election, and the potential ramifications for the
supreme court, which looks to have 4 new justices appointed in the next eight
years. Since, at this point in my life,
the majority of my Facebook friends are of the same general political persuasion
as myself, I did not expect much pushback, if any. At first I only had a few likes and one or
two supportive comments. After about
half a day, however, my father posted a comment that was not supportive of the
article. In fact, his post was filled
with a lot of strong emotion and conviction against much of what the article
said, and many things not directly stated by the article, but which are often
included in these types of discussions.
I was surprised to see such a strong reaction from my father, as I
usually am in these types of political conversations, because he and I seem to
agree on so many other issues, and our deep values and convictions for life run
so consistently in parallel. Every time
politics is brought to the surface, I am befuddled at how differently we seem
to see things, at least on the surface.
But it is in just that qualification (“on the surface”) where the
practice of mindfulness can do its deepest work. Mindfulness helps me to drop beneath the
surface of things and begin to look more and more deeply into their heart. What I see on Facebook, in the way people
have conversations like these, is almost always, always a kind of superficial
listening with very intense, often angry or hurtful responses. But I have noticed, in my own and others’ interactions
about sensitive and controversial topics, that we rarely seem to listen for
what is going on beneath the surface of a discussion. Too often we do not take the time to sit with
the fears, grief and wounds that can underlie intense convictions. Though we know that our own convictions are
deeply shaped by experience, reflection, feeling and insight, it is hard for us
to remember this in a moment of disagreement, and it is often even harder to
acknowledge that someone else’s deep convictions arise from experience,
reflection, feeling and insight as well.
What was beneficial in my exchange with my father was that –
because of our relationship and my regard for him as a person – I did not
simply write him off as “an idiot” with views contrary to my own (as I
unfortunately might have had he been someone else, or had I been in a different
place that day). I was not stuck in my
views, and so I began to look more deeply at why he was saying what he was saying. I began to hear the hurt and disappointment
that my father feels with his government.
I began to hear a sense of despair and hopelessness that gives rise to
anger. I realized that his intellectual
convictions rise in part from emotional states that are present within
him. Rather than invalidating his
intellectual perspective, it helped me understand the soil in which that
perspective has grown as a human
soil, not to be despised simply because his viewpoints are different from my
own. As a result of pondering my
father’s underlying emotional states, I began to touch my own fears and
disappointments and anger regarding my government. I began to touch the ways in which I have
felt let down or betrayed, and I realized that many of my own intellectual
convictions can arise as ways to defend someone’s actions or assert a point of
view rather than sit with the discomfort of pain regarding government. There
is, ironically, so much powerlessness in the lives of individuals and groups
who live in a governmental structure that has, since the Gettysburg address and
before, been intended to be “of the people, by the people and for the
people.” In touching my own grief, loss
and fear about my country, I could better create space for those similar
emotions in my father to arise. In this
situation, it became less about battling out ideas, and more about sharing a
journey of discontent and confusion about a government gone awry. Instead of fighting against each other to win
the other over to an ideology – or to belittle another for having the “wrong”
ideology – I began to see us as two people on the same side, geared toward the
highest good for the nation, the world, and the people within it. I have my reasons for believing that certain
political convictions lend themselves more readily toward that, and my father
has his reasons for believing what he believes.
And – because I did not write him off as a whacko on the other end of
the political spectrum who, by nature of his disagreement with me, is obviously
uninformed, foolish or blind – I was able to look at where his convictions come
from and why. I didn't set out to make
him believe what I believe. But I did
accept his perspectives as an “antithesis” to my “thesis” – a kind of Hegelian
invitation to look more deeply at my own beliefs and see where they might need
adjustment or deepening, how I could move from thesis, through antithesis, to a
synthesis that accounts for both, something deeper than what I originally had
to offer. I remember reading Thay’s
writings in Living Buddha, Living Christ.
He says that, while from one perspective there are “right views” and
“wrong views,” from another perspective, all
views are wrong. By their very
nature of being a view from a certain perspective, they are conditioned and
limited. There is always another
perspective or point of view. Our unwillingness to acknowledge this and look to
understand and grow into other viewpoints is the cause of great suffering. When the Buddha was asked why the spiritually
inclined ascetics in India fought with each other, he said that it was their
attachment to views, their preoccupation with views, etc.
The process of engaging with my father, engaging with the
discomfort caused through having someone disagree with a sentiment I put forth,
and working with my habit energy of either shrinking or over-retaliating...
this process allowed me to come into a deeper place. And it made me realize that at the heart of
so much public and private discourse is a lack of respect for the other. I realized this because a key difference in
my interaction with my father about this topic, aside from my own practice of
mindfulness, was the deep respect I hold for him as both my father and a human
being. See, my father is a retired
school teacher. For over 30 years he
taught moderately to severely emotionally and behaviorally disturbed special
education students in inner city high schools.
In his late fifties/early sixties he became a chaplain, first in hospice, now in a hospital. In broad, general terms he has, as much as anyone else I know, modeled
humility and integrity throughout my life, and his life's story, shaped by the choices he has made and continues to make, is a
testament to courage, strength, kindness, and compassion. So I knew, on every level possible, that
there was more to our exchange than a simple conflict of two ideologies. I knew that there was the encounter one
person (me, Jonathan) was having with another (him, Richard). I knew that we both had and have something to
offer each other in terms of opportunities for growth and self-reflection. And I knew that if our focus was about
proving our convictions correct – or at least more correct than the other
person’s – then we would miss out on this deeper offering. And this, I believe, is the living out of the
second and third of the fourteen mindfulness trainings. The second is nonattachment to views:
Aware of the suffering
created by attachment to views and wrong perceptions, we are determined to
avoid being narrow-minded and bound to present views. We are committed to learning and practicing
nonattachment from views and being open to others’ insights and experiences in
order to benefit from the collective wisdom.
Insight is revealed through the practice of compassionate listening,
deep looking, and letting go of notions rather than through the accumulation of
intellectual knowledge. We are aware
that the knowledge we presently possess is not changeless, absolute truth. Truth is found in life, and we will observe
life within and around us in every moment, ready to learn throughout our lives.
The third is freedom of thought:
Aware of the suffering
brought about when we impose our view on others, we are determined not to force
others, even our children, by any means whatsoever – such as authority, threat,
money, propaganda, or indoctrination – to adopt our views. We are committed to respecting the rights of
others to be different, to choose what to believe and how to decide. We will, however, learn to help others let go
of and transform narrowness through loving speech and compassionate dialogue.
The humility here, to borrow from TS Eliot, is endless. We are invited in every moment to not react –
to create space between a trigger and our response to it, so that we can choose
more freely how we will respond. Sometimes
the best engagement is not on the level of ideas, but on the level of the
heart. The opportunity to reflect on my
own perspectives, to know the movements inside of me that give rise to the
ideas I espouse, and to understand myself and the other more deeply and with
greater compassion are worth the mindful pause even if I end up using the same
words I might have used before pausing (which is almost never the case). The listening, the awareness and the space
between my experiences and my judgments of those experiences are always worth
it. Because we are all going to have our
fear, sadness and anger about the world in which we live. And if we can help one another engage those
fears more deeply by engaging our own with authenticity and openness, then we
are on the right path. We are walking in
the right direction.
So as I end, I bring my left hand together with my right as
a lotus near my heart. And I bow to my
dear father, who – along with my mother – gave me life; I bow to his parents
and siblings, who shaped him into the person he has become, as he has in turn
shaped me into the person I am today. I
am a continuation of him, bearing that continuation torch in my own unique
way. And I honor and thank him for his
own version of the two mindfulness trainings I shared above. Because without that, I would have had to
fight so much harder to become the man I am today. It doesn't mean I have to agree with
everything my father thinks or espouses.
But it does mean I respect him enough to listen deeply for the wisdom
and insight that he continues to offer me.
I think that all of life is an opportunity for practice, if
we choose it as such. And all of life
can be fuel for conflict, if we choose that instead. At the end of the day, I can still say that I
don’t agree with this or that I do agree with that, but I do not need to carry
the energy of hostility or conflict in my heart. I recognize someone else trying to work with
his own energies of disappointment, anger, grief, fear, etc., as I am – as we
all are. I see a companion on the
journey, rather than an obstacle or an objector to my staunchly held
ideologies. I see a friend. A father.
A fellow human being. And that is
first and last. Before and after we
disagree at the level of the mind, we are, first and last, fellow human beings
on this earth.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)